Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

42%
+1 −2
Q&A Which of Pierre Boulez's composition(s) are considered unlistenable, and/or the (Modernist) Emperor's New Clothes?

I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli, and Répons. I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonat...

0 answers  ·  posted 3y ago by TextKit‭  ·  edited 3y ago by TextKit‭

Question modernism
#3: Post edited by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-12-28T10:46:27Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 _Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli_, and _Répons_. **I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonates with me!**
  • Which Boulez's other compositions do musicologists judge to be merely Modernist [balderdash](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/51357), [pretentiousness](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/173317)?
  • I quote Dr. Robert Greenberg [(BA Music magna cum laude, Princeton, PhD music composition UC Berkeley)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Greenberg#Biography) in _Great Music of the 20th Century Course Guidebook_, p 114:
  • >- Most Ultraserialist music was created without any thought to how it might be perceived by an actual listener in real time. As a result, it should come as no surprise that most of this music makes no perceivable sense.
  • >
  • >- It is a most unfortunate fact that the seemingly random, frantic ugliness of the vast majority of Ultraserialist music and its rejection by the musical public actually served to reinforce the composers’ sense that they were on to something special. They thought that they were an aesthetic and intellectual elite.
  • >
  • >- In 1999, Boulez was asked in an interview to explain why so few Ultraserial works from the 1950s and 1960s were still performed. Boulez’s response constitutes one of the great understatements of all time: “Well, perhaps we did not take sufficiently into account the way music is perceived by the listener.”
  • I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 _Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli_, and _Répons_. **I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonates with me!**
  • Which Boulez's other compositions do musicologists judge to be merely Modernist [balderdash](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/51357), [pretentiousness](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/173317)?
  • I quote Robert Greenberg [(BA Music magna cum laude, Princeton, PhD music composition UC Berkeley)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Greenberg#Biography) in _Great Music of the 20th Century Course Guidebook_, p 114:
  • >- Most Ultraserialist music was created without any thought to how it might be perceived by an actual listener in real time. As a result, it should come as no surprise that most of this music makes no perceivable sense.
  • >
  • >- It is a most unfortunate fact that the seemingly random, frantic ugliness of the vast majority of Ultraserialist music and its rejection by the musical public actually served to reinforce the composers’ sense that they were on to something special. They thought that they were an aesthetic and intellectual elite.
  • >
  • >- In 1999, Boulez was asked in an interview to explain why so few Ultraserial works from the 1950s and 1960s were still performed. Boulez’s response constitutes one of the great understatements of all time: “Well, perhaps we did not take sufficiently into account the way music is perceived by the listener.”
#2: Post edited by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-12-28T10:39:16Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Which of Pierre Boulez's composition(s) do musicologists consider unlistenable, and/or the (Modernist) Emperor's New Clothes?
  • Which of Pierre Boulez's composition(s) are considered unlistenable, and/or the (Modernist) Emperor's New Clothes?
  • I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 _Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli_, and _Répons_. **I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonates with me!**
  • Do musicologists reckon Boulez's other compositions to be merely Modernist [balderdash](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/51357), [pretentiousness](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/173317)?
  • I quote Dr. Robert Greenberg [(BA Music magna cum laude, Princeton, PhD music composition UC Berkeley)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Greenberg#Biography) in _Great Music of the 20th Century Course Guidebook_, p 114:
  • >- Most Ultraserialist music was created without any thought to how it might be perceived by an actual listener in real time. As a result, it should come as no surprise that most of this music makes no perceivable sense.
  • >- It is a most unfortunate fact that the seemingly random, frantic ugliness of the vast majority of Ultraserialist music and its rejection by the musical public actually served to reinforce the composers’ sense that they were on to something special. They thought that they were an aesthetic and intellectual elite.
  • >- In 1999, Boulez was asked in an interview to explain why so few Ultraserial works from the 1950s and 1960s were still performed. Boulez’s response constitutes one of the great understatements of all time: “Well, perhaps we did not take sufficiently into account the way music is perceived by the listener.”
  • I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 _Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli_, and _Répons_. **I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonates with me!**
  • Which Boulez's other compositions do musicologists judge to be merely Modernist [balderdash](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/51357), [pretentiousness](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/173317)?
  • I quote Dr. Robert Greenberg [(BA Music magna cum laude, Princeton, PhD music composition UC Berkeley)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Greenberg#Biography) in _Great Music of the 20th Century Course Guidebook_, p 114:
  • >- Most Ultraserialist music was created without any thought to how it might be perceived by an actual listener in real time. As a result, it should come as no surprise that most of this music makes no perceivable sense.
  • >
  • >- It is a most unfortunate fact that the seemingly random, frantic ugliness of the vast majority of Ultraserialist music and its rejection by the musical public actually served to reinforce the composers’ sense that they were on to something special. They thought that they were an aesthetic and intellectual elite.
  • >
  • >- In 1999, Boulez was asked in an interview to explain why so few Ultraserial works from the 1950s and 1960s were still performed. Boulez’s response constitutes one of the great understatements of all time: “Well, perhaps we did not take sufficiently into account the way music is perceived by the listener.”
#1: Initial revision by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-12-28T10:37:48Z (almost 3 years ago)
Which of Pierre Boulez's composition(s) do musicologists consider unlistenable, and/or the (Modernist) Emperor's New Clothes?
I can brook listening to Boulez's 3 _Piano Sonatas, Le Marteau sans maître, Pli selon pli_, and _Répons_. **I've listened to Boulez's OTHER compositions THE PAST 20 YEARS, but nothing else of his resonates with me!**

Do musicologists reckon Boulez's other compositions to be merely Modernist [balderdash](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/51357), [pretentiousness](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/173317)? 

I quote Dr. Robert Greenberg [(BA Music magna cum laude, Princeton, PhD music composition UC Berkeley)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Greenberg#Biography) in _Great Music of the 20th Century Course Guidebook_, p 114:

>- Most Ultraserialist music was created without any thought to how it might be perceived by an actual listener in real time. As a result, it should come as no surprise that most of this music makes no perceivable sense.

>- It is a most unfortunate fact that the seemingly random, frantic ugliness of the vast majority of Ultraserialist music and its rejection by the musical public actually served to reinforce the composers’ sense that they were on to something special. They thought that they were an aesthetic and intellectual elite.

>- In 1999, Boulez was asked in an interview to explain why so few Ultraserial works from the 1950s and 1960s were still performed. Boulez’s response constitutes one of the great understatements of all time: “Well, perhaps we did not take sufficiently into account the way music is perceived by the listener.”